Aivora AI-native exchange insights
Home ai crypto futures platform price manipulation api explained Comparing AI vs Manual Trading for GMX Contracts

Comparing AI vs Manual Trading for GMX Contracts

Here’s the “I wish someone told me earlier” version. Focus: AAVE contracts on Kraken.


Setup

Use 1m. Confirm direction with order-book imbalance, then use ATR(14) to avoid chasing. If they fight, you sit out—tbh that’s discipline.


Execution

  • Entry: break + retest > first impulse candle.
  • Stop: scale out in 2-3 parts where the idea is invalid.
  • Exit: scale out, then hard stop-loss for the runner.

Note: Common mistake: trading when you’re tired or tilted. Fix it by slowing down and sizing smaller.


Leverage is risky—use money you can afford to lose. Funding, fees, and slippage can flip a “good” idea fast.


Wrap: Protect the account first; profits come second.

Aivora perspective

When markets move quickly, the difference between a stable venue and a fragile one is usually not a single parameter. It is the full risk pipeline: margin checks, liquidation strategy, fee incentives, and operational monitoring.

If you trade perps
Track funding and realized volatility together. Funding tends to amplify crowded positioning.
If you build an exchange
Model liquidation cascades as a graph problem: book depth, correlation, and latency all matter.
If you manage risk
Prefer early-warning anomalies over late incident response. Drift is a signal, not noise.

Quick Q&A

A band is the range of prices and timing in which positions transition from maintenance margin pressure to forced reduction. Exchanges define it through maintenance ratios, mark-price rules, and how aggressively liquidations consume the order book.
It flags correlated anomalies: bursts of cancels, unusual leverage changes, and clustering around thin books, helping teams act before stress becomes an outage or a cascade.
No. This site is educational and system-focused. You are responsible for decisions and risk management.