Alright, let’s do this the clean way. Focus: AAVE contracts on Phemex.
Myth buster
- Myth: more indicators = more accuracy.
Reality: more indicators often = more confusion. - Myth: higher leverage = higher profit.
Reality: higher leverage = higher chance of forced exits.
| Thing | What to do |
|---|---|
| Choppy market | Lower leverage, fewer trades, wait for clean levels. |
| Trending market | Let winners run, trail stop, don’t over-take-profit. |
| High funding | Reduce hold time or wait for better entry. |
Heads-up: Common mistake: placing stops exactly on obvious levels. Fix it by slowing down and sizing smaller.
Funding, fees, and slippage can flip a “good” idea fast. Educational only, not financial advice.
Wrap: If it feels like gambling, size down. Immediately.
Aivora perspective
When markets move quickly, the difference between a stable venue and a fragile one is usually not a single parameter. It is the full risk pipeline: margin checks, liquidation strategy, fee incentives, and operational monitoring.
If you trade perps
Track funding and realized volatility together. Funding tends to amplify crowded positioning.
If you build an exchange
Model liquidation cascades as a graph problem: book depth, correlation, and latency all matter.
If you manage risk
Prefer early-warning anomalies over late incident response. Drift is a signal, not noise.
Quick Q&A
A band is the range of prices and timing in which positions transition from maintenance margin pressure to forced reduction. Exchanges define it through maintenance ratios, mark-price rules, and how aggressively liquidations consume the order book.
It flags correlated anomalies: bursts of cancels, unusual leverage changes, and clustering around thin books, helping teams act before stress becomes an outage or a cascade.
No. This site is educational and system-focused. You are responsible for decisions and risk management.